Why Segmentation is Still the Future of Fundraising



Donors are being bombarded from every direction — by the world at large, and by the nonprofit sector itself.

Donors are increasingly being solicited for attention from within the non-profit space.
Increase in email volume from
2023 to 2024, with orgs sending 62 messages per subscriber.
Only this many nonprofits regularly remove unengaged subscribers, actively contributing to the noise.
Explosion in mobile and text messaging volume in 2023.
[Source: M+R Benchmarks / Nonprofit Tech for Good Report]

In a world of mass communication, relevance is the only real differentiator.
Consumers who engage exclusively with messages tailored to their specific interests
[Source: 2026 Email Marketing Statistics for Nonprofits]

Irrelevance isn't neutral. It has a price tag.

Fundraising success hinges on understanding and nurturing donor relationships. Your communication must reflect the unique stage and history of each connection to effectively build on it.

— Jane from Accounting
— Mom
— Jane from Accounting
— Mom
Same words. Completely different feeling. Relationship changes everything.


Reaching donors across both physical and digital channels drastically increases their value compared to relying on just one channel alone.
vs online-only
Median revenue for multi-channel donors is double that of online-only.
vs offline-only
Offline-only donors who receive emails have 90% higher annual value than those that don't receive emails.
[Source: Blackbaud / NextAfter via The Agitator]

No single channel reaches everyone. Each touchpoint is a new opportunity to connect — and a missed channel is a missed donor.
*statistics vary between 35% and 90%

Cutting Mail Costs You Online Revenue.
Eliminating direct mail for online donors often removes the primary trigger for their giving. Direct mail acts as a crucial prompt for digital engagement.
Cutting direct mail by 75% for donors who transitioned to online-only caused total net revenue to actively decline.
Even though these donors were unlikely to return a physical check, the control group receiving full direct mail won on overall net revenue.
[Source: Masterworks Agency]

A personalized letter Monday. A generic blast email Tuesday. The illusion of relationship is broken instantly.
One story, every channel. When your mail, email, and SMS echo the same message, the donor relationship becomes authentic, intentional, and powerful.


Each step in a lifecycle has a dramatically different retention rate — and demands a different strategy.
[Source: Fundraising Effectiveness Project - September 2025]


New donors represent the second largest share of your donor base — but have the worst retention.
An important portion of your donor database. When adding New Donors who gave a second gift, this number jumps to 47%, the largest segment.
Only about 14% of new donors make a second gift.
It costs 10 times more to acquire a new donor than to retain an existing one.
[Source: Fundraising Effectiveness Project - September 2025]

Peer-to-peer and memorial gifts are driven by personal affinity, not organizational connection.

Not all new donors have the same connection to your cause. Where they started shapes how you must engage them.
P2P and In Memory donors — their connection is to an individual, not your mission.
Grateful patient donors — their connection is to care received, not your broader mission.
Repeat donors deeply invested in your mission — giving regularly and advocating for your cause.
Important: segment new donors with specific messaging and strategy based on what motivated the gift. Their journey to loyalty starts here.

Understanding what motivated the gift is the foundation of every new donor journey.
Gives to support a friend's fundraising, not the org directly.
Donates to honour a loved one, tied to a personal milestone or loss.
Gives through a gala, golf tournament, or similar hosted event.
Gives out of gratitude for care received, a deeply personal and high-affinity connection.
No prior relationship, gives to support the mission or because of a premium (gift).
Converts through an ad or social campaign, motivated by your message.

Peer-to-Peer can be a great way to acquire new supporters. The ultimate goal is not to keep them as P2P donors, but rather to convert them into loyal supporters who give directly to your mission.
Many organizations default to a do not contact policy due to the fear that reaching out will burn the donor or the participant they supported, risking alienation.
Communicating with P2P donors can build a genuine relationship for future asks, especially if the original participant steps away.
Embrace P2P donors and participants within your ongoing communication strategy and including them in thoughtful ask campaigns to convert them into direct supporters.

In Memory donations are a deeply personal entry point for many first-time donors, driven by a desire to honor a loved one. The goal is to convert new in-memory donors to loyal donors, but treating them like everyone else can be a costly mistake.
These donors should be carried along in your standard outreach for 5 years, treated just like any other active or lapsed supporter.
The majority of In Memory donors give out of duty or to pay respects. A significant portion may never develop true affinity for your cause.
Actively try to convert new donors within the first 12 to 18 months, and intentionally drop those who do not convert in that time frame.


Repeat donors are your most reliable, cost-effective segment. The data makes the case unmistakably.
Repeat retained donors account for roughly 40% of your donor base, and over 60% of total dollars raised.
Nearly half of repeat donors give again, compared to just 14% of new donors.
Retaining a repeat donor costs a fraction of what it takes to find a new one.
[Source: FEP Report]

Retention increases with donation amount. The more a donor gives, the more likely they are to give again. Understanding these segments is crucial for targeted engagement.
[Source: Fundraising Report Card]

Repeat donors are not all equal. Segment them by giving approach to tailor your communications and asks.
Include Major and Mid-Level donors as segments (instead of excluding them) to see your full donor universe.

Speak to what brought them to your organization in the first place. Their path to your door shapes your message.
The deepest personal connection to your cause
Mission-aligned insiders with professional pride
Once a supporter's supporter — now a direct mission advocate in the making
Time-invested advocates ready to deepen their commitment
...and everyone else. The point is to speak to their lived experience — not just their wallet.

If you don't solicit a donor at year end because they gave earlier in the year — look around the room. Someone sitting next to you will solicit them, and get a donation.
Withholding an ask isn't stewardship — it's leaving revenue on the table. Let your donors decide. Give them the opportunity.

Lapsed donors are very different from active repeat donors. Treating them as a subset of repeat donors skews your data and blindsides opportunities.
Donors who haven't given in the last two years are approximately 98% likely to never give again. Including them in your Repeat donor numbers distorts your retention rates and conversion focus.
At 43% retention, just about every repeat donor within the last 2 years is worth soliciting. Beyond 2 years, you need to be picky.


Recaptured donors are a smaller, harder-to-reach segment, but not all are worth the same investment.
Recaptured donors make up roughly 13% of your donor file.
Only 2% of lapsed donors are successfully reactivated — making selectivity critical.
Reactivating a lapsed donor costs roughly half of acquiring a brand new one.
[Source: FEP Report]

Not all lapsed donors deserve equal investment. Focus your reactivation efforts strategically.
Look at how they originally came to your file. Were they memorial/tribute donors or P2P supporters who gave to support a friend? If their gift was highly situational, standard reactivation appeals will likely fail.
Donors who gave sporadically and in very low amounts may not be the best investment. Focus on those who showed long-term commitment — given consistently over 10+ years, or whose last gift was $100 or more.
Set your metrics on recapture above dollars raised. Your recaptured donors will be worth more in the long run than their initial recaptured donation. Measure reactivation success, not just immediate revenue.

What can a comprehensive segmentation strategy look like?

Segmentation can feel overwhelming—distinct messages, multiple channels, different languages. But you don't have to do it all at once. Start with the segments; the rest follows.
Group donors by behavior, relationship, or potential
Understand where your biggest opportunities and gaps live
Invest your writing time where it moves the needle most

Each new segment requires tailored content and operational effort. The focus remains on strategic segmentation that adds real value, rather than complexity for its own sake.

Sylvie Riendeau
Vice-President, Communications & Marketing


When we come back: how to put a comprehensive segmentation strategy into practice.

Hands-on execution: queries, exports, and multi-channel campaign segmentation.

Build and assign donor segments for mail, email, and more
Prepare files for your mail house or any downstream need
Gain better understanding of Query and how to use it in segmentation

Build donor lists with powerful filters
Native functionality sor segmentation and appeal assigment
Modern platform for advanced segmentation and appeal assignment
Pull constituent data out of RE NXT for external use


The Segment tab in Quick Letters combines multiple queries into one mailing — automatically eliminating duplicates, enforcing hierarchy, and applying specific appeals or packages to each segment so every constituent is included only once.


AmpliPhi is a nonprofit-focused segmentation platform that integrates with RE NXT to deliver Clarity, Control, and Confidence in your campaigns. Today we'll focus on AmpliPhi Lite — built for advanced segmentation, it segments donor audiences up to 10x faster than traditional methods, with hierarchical organization and automatic deduplication across omnichannel campaigns.



Every segmentation project in RE NXT should follow this same sequence.

A Constituent Appeal is a record on the constituent that tracks each solicitation (Appeal) they received — including segment (Package) and date, giving you a clear history of how often a constituent was solicited and ultimately how effective each appeal was.

A donor can qualify for multiple segments. Hierarchy determines which segment wins. Your priority order will determine which segment each donor lands in.
Highest priority — always wins
Second priority
Lowest priority in this example

Who someone is (segment) is a separate decision from how you reach them (channel).
Cut up your donor universe into smaller audiences based on donor source, interactions, relationship etc. Do this regardless of whether you can communicate with them or not.
Create separate lists of everyone you can reach on each channel, regardless of if you want to communicate with them or not.
Combine Segments and Channels together for each Campaign (Appeal in RE NXT).


Results don't change unless manually refreshed. Can easily blindside you to errors and wasted time figuring out what the issue is.
Re-runs criteria live each time. Results update automatically.

Merge queries combine results from multiple queries — however the results create static queries (remember previous slide).
Creates a static query with no criteria, becomes difficult to understand the logic of the merged queries.
Use subqueries (Select from query) to reference other queries as criteria within a single query. This mimics an "AND" merge query.

Before exporting or assigning appeals, validate your counts at each query stage. Check that the numbers make sense before moving on.
Does the number match your expectation?
If you want to validate the results, add some basic output like name to see the list.
Don't forget to remove your output before moving on to the next query.

RE NXT's "last gift" field reflects the most recent gift on the constituent record — which may not be the gift relevant to your campaign.
A donor's last gift may be a ticket purchase or a 0$ refund and cause errors in your logic
In most cases, we are looking for donors who made a (last) gift in a certain time period. Just look for any gift within that time period that matches your gift criteria and leverage segment hierarchy take care of the ordering the time periods.

Gift Summary fields aggregate giving history on the constituent record — useful counting gifts or summing amounts.
Great for giving levels
Distinguish first-time from multi-year donors quickly



Has a gift in last 2 years
AND Total number of gifts in the last 5 years = 1
Has a gift in last 2 years
AND Total number of gifts in the last 5 years > 1
Total number of gifts in last 2 years = 0
AND Total number of gifts in the last 5 years > 1


Export is the most efficient way to extract your segmented data from Raiser's Edge NXT.
Each constituent gets a single, comprehensive row, eliminating the risk of accidental duplicates.
Add each constituent's assigned appeal (segment) so your mail house can match up segment and letter.
Send your mail house consistent file formats by re-using the same export every time.

Export will migrate to NXT Web View by end of this year. The new version uses a Query with Single Row Output option — one row per constituent, even with multiple gifts.


Complex segmentation goes beyond three basic groups. It layers multiple dimensions — giving level, recency, channel preference, geography, ask amounts — into a matrix of segments.
Mid-level, major donor, monthly, reactivation tracks
Mail + email + digital + phone in one campaign


Map out your full segment × channel matrix on paper before building a single query or use AmpliPhi's segmentation designer and build as you go. Each cell = one Constituent Appeal to assign.

Every campaign follows this three-step macro flow
Combine them in the Constituent Appeal — not in your query logic
Always exclude higher-priority segments from lower-priority queries
Don't rely on "last gift" constituent fields alone
It's what connects your segmentation work to the mail house


Segmentation Workshop